We've Moved! Please visit our new and improved forum over at our new portal: https://portal.plumvoice.com/hc/en-us/community/topics
Search found 5 matches
- Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:20 pm
- Forum: Plum iOn Q&A
- Topic: hosted developer cross-linked accounts, outbound denied
- Replies: 2
- Views: 23506
hosted developer cross-linked accounts, outbound denied
3 developers at my company have developer accounts. We noticed that on any 1 when clicking on DeveloperTools->OutboundCalling that the system says "access denied" and the information for all 3 is the same to submit a request. Somehow they have been cross-linked? For the actual queuing of calls, I kn...
- Tue Dec 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Forum: Plum iOn Q&A
- Topic: Clarification of call "attempt"
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11620
- Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:48 am
- Forum: Plum iOn Q&A
- Topic: Clarification of call "attempt"
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11620
- Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:45 pm
- Forum: Plum iOn Q&A
- Topic: Clarification of call "attempt"
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11620
Clarification of call "attempt"
Recent testing of our Plum turnkey box uncovered that if a callee_type detection is not voice, the call attempt *can* be considered failed and requeued. It does not appear to always fail when callee_type is answeringmachine. Forgive me for not having a specific issue, but I had thought that the outb...
- Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:40 pm
- Forum: Plum DEV Q&A
- Topic: issue with break element
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3420
issue with break element
Below is a test VXML of the same format we use for all our current outbound messages. The main message is repeated twice (in the case below, "If this message has been....") Without the <break> element, some people think the pause between repetitions is inadequate (too short.) However, once the <brea...